Take Action! The Debate Continues Over MEGA
Important Dates to Remember
RCV Myths EXPOSED
Common Questions About Ranked Choice Voting
How Would You Rather Your Taxpayer Dollars Be Spent?
Find Your Voice!
Take Action!
|
|
The debate continues over the "Make Elections Great Again" Act, which would federalize elections at a level not contemplated by the Constitution. Here is an article from the Cato Institute explaining the case against this bill. There is something you can do! The following is reprinted from FairVote: The MEGA Act (H.R. 7300) creates a new set of anti-voter laws for federal elections, including banning RCV in general elections for Federal offices. Five jurisdictions already use ranked choice voting in federal elections - Alaska, Maine, Hawaii, Georgia and Washington, D.C. Voters in these states - and every state - should be able to elect their representatives in the manner they deem best, including using ranked choice voting and proportional representation. So please, if you haven’t already - take a moment to write to your members of Congress imploring them to stop the MEGA Act and speak out against this attack on voting rights. Click Here to Contact Your Elected Leaders Contacting your representative and asking them to protect Ranked Choice Voting is the most effective action you can take today. Every voice counts, and together, we can fight for a more representative democracy. Below is the list, as of today, of Texas congressmen who are cosponsors of H.R. 3700. |
|
|
Important Dates to Remember |
|
Texas primary runoff elections - those pesky runoff elections we are trying to make go away. April 27: Last day to register to vote in these elections May 18-22: Early Voting May 26: Election Day
|
RCV Myths EXPOSED |
|
In a paper titled "Shaky political "science" misses mark on ranked choice voting", the quality and credibility of scholarly research about ranked choice voting (RCV) is assessed. Forty-one studies are reviewed, many of which have been cited in public debates over RCV reforms. The authors found that the most reliable studies were grounded in real-world election data, while many studies critiquing RCV have relied on flawed survey methods and abstract mathematical models that failed to accurately simulate what happens in real-world elections. Despite the availability of data from over a thousand RCV elections since 2004 - spanning 14 million voters across 50+ jurisdictions - many studies eschewed empirical election data in favor of speculative or unrealistic simulations. Since the paper is 38 pages long, we are going to break it into separate studies and present some of them individually in this section of the newsletter over the next few months. The first is called "Beyond the Spoiler Effect: Can Ranked Choice Voting Solve the Problem of Political Polarization?" This non-peer-reviewed research paper by three university academics used mathematical modeling methods to assess the impact of RCV on political polarization. The bottom line is that the authors used computer simulations and modeling rather than easily available real world data and came to conclusions that are contradicted dramatically by actual real world elections as well as the results from their own study. For more information on this particular study or the complete paper, click on the links above in this article. |
Common Questions About
|
Is it possible to audit elections held with instant runoffs?First - what is a risk-limiting audit? A risk-limiting audit (RLA) checks a random sample of voter-verifiable paper ballots, giving strong evidence to support the reported election results (or triggering a recount). Here is short video. Answer: Yes. Risk-limiting audits of elections run with instant runoff voting have been successfully performed by the Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center. |
How Would You Rather Your
|
|
On May 26, Texans will return to the polls to vote in the primary runoffs for those races in March that were not decided with one candidate receiving 50% or more of the vote. It is estimated that the races will cost Texas taxpayers millions of dollars and subject Texans to almost three more months of exposure to the negative campaigning of which we are already weary. And all that for the prospect of a significantly lower turnout, averaging around 48% of the original voters. Not much of a return on our investment! Instant runoff voting is a better, faster, cheaper alternative that would ensure nominees have majority support, without the cost or diminished turnout of runoffs. From: Fair Vote article |
Find Your Voice! |
Primary Runoffs Provide an Opportunity
|
|
|
Please join us in our efforts to educate voters about Instant Runoff Voting. Play your part and persuade your legislature to make it a reality. |
We Need Social Media Volunteers!Social media provides the best way to get in touch with most voters and potential voters today. This is a resource we have barely tapped into and really need someone who is proficient here. Young voters are an untapped constituency and are plugged into all social media platforms. Help us get the word out about all things instant runoff voting.
If you are interested, please contact Mary Beth Gilbert.
If you are interested, please contact Mary Beth Gilbert. IRVforTexas Relies on Donations
|
|
What We're Reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instant Runoff Voting for Texas · TX, United States |



